皇冠登1申请(www.huangguan.us)是皇冠体育官方信用网线上开放的登入1代理开户申请业务。皇冠登1申请开放信用网和现金网登1代理申请、信用网和现金网会员注册、线上充值线上投注、线上提现、皇冠官方APP下载等业务。皇冠登1申请开户提供皇冠官网管理端登录线路、皇冠官网会员端登录线路,皇冠官网手机网址、皇冠官网最新网址导航等服务。

首页体育正文

皇冠信用网开户(www.hg108.vip)_Judge delays decision on Latif corruption charges

admin2022-07-1218

皇冠 guan[信用网开户{hu}www.hg108.vip)是‘shi’一『yi』个开放《fang》皇冠正『zheng』网【wang】即时比分、皇冠信用网开户的『de』平台。皇冠信【xin】用{yong}网(wang)开户平台(www.hg108.vip)提供 gong[最新 xin[皇冠【guan】登录“lu”,皇‘huang’冠APP下载包含新皇冠{guan}体育 yu[代理、会员APP,提供《gong》皇「huang」冠「guan」信用网代理〖li〗开户、皇{huang}冠〖guan〗信用网会员「yuan」开【kai】户业“ye”务。

,

THE Sessions Court in Johor Baru today postponed decision on the case against former Johor executive councillor Abd Latif Bandi, his son, and a real estate consultant, who are facing 37 charges of corruption and money laundering over RM35.7 million.

Judge Kamarudin Kamsun, who was scheduled to deliver the verdict today, said there were still some arguments that needed to be submitted by parties involved and he would then rule on August 7.

“I need to listen to those arguments before making a decision. So, I can’t do it today, hence, a new date will be set,” he said.

Lawyer Salehuddin Saidin, represented Latif, 56, and his son, Ahmad Fauzan Hatim, 30, then applied for the court to hear the submission by the defence.

During the proceedings, the court heard submissions by the prosecution, represented by Deputy Director I, legal and prosecution division of the Malaysian Anti -Corruption Commission (MACC) Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin, and assisted by deputy public prosecutors Ahmad Akram Gharib and Mahadi Abdul Jumaat.

On June 14, 2017, Latif, Ahmad Fauzan and Amir Shariffuddin Abd Raub, 49, were charged with 33 counts of corruption and four counts of money laundering for a total of RM35.7 million, and they pleaded not guilty to all charges.

On April 21, 2019, Kamarudin acquitted and discharged the three of them of the 37 charges after finding the prosecution having failed to prove its case.

However, on November 7, 2021, the High Court ordered the former chairman of the state housing and local government committee and his co-defendants to enter their defence, after it overturned the Sessions Court verdict.

On the corruption charges, the three men are charged under section 28 (1) (C) of the MACC Act 2009, read together with section 16 (a) (B) of the same act.

They were also charged under section 32 (8) (c) and section 89 of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti -Terrorism Financing and Proceeds from Unlawful Activities (AMLA) Act 2001. – Bernama, June 26, 2022.


转载「zai」说明:本文转‘zhuan’载「zai」自《zi》Sunbet。

网友评论

1条评论